(Optional Memorial of the Blessed Virgin
Mary)
On Saturdays in Ordinary Time
when there is no obligatory memorial, an optional memorial of the Blessed
Virgin Mary is allowed [1].
Mass texts may be taken from the Common
of the Blessed Virgin Mary, from a Votive
Mass, or from the special collection of Masses for the Blessed Virgin Mary.
 |
| “Jeroboam Offering Sacrifice for the Idol” by Jean-Honoré Fragonard, 1752 |
Reading I: 1
Kings 12:26-32; 13:33-34
Jeroboam thought to himself:
“The kingdom will return to
David’s house.
If now this people go up to
offer sacrifices
in the temple of the LORD in Jerusalem
the hearts of this people
will return to their master,
Rehoboam, king of Judah
and they will kill me.”
After taking counsel, the
king made two calves of gold
and said to the people:
“You have been going up to Jerusalem
Here is your God, O Israel,
who brought you up from the land
of Egypt
And he put one in Bethel
This led to sin, because the
people frequented those calves
in Bethel
He also built temples on the
high places
and made priests from among
the people who were not Levites.
Jeroboam established a feast
in the eighth month
on the fifteenth day of the
month
to duplicate in Bethel the pilgrimage feast of Judah
with sacrifices to the calves
he had made;
and he stationed in Bethel
Jeroboam did not give up his
evil ways after this,
but again made priests for
the high places
from among the common people.
Whoever desired it was
consecrated
and became a priest of the
high places.
This was a sin on the part of
the house of Jeroboam
for which it was to be cut
off and destroyed from the earth.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary on 1
Kgs 12:26-32; 13:33-34
Following the breakup of the
Davidic Kingdom under Solomon’s rule, Jeroboam, fearing for his own life, tries
to insure that the kingdom will not be reunited. To insure the people do not reunite, he creates
graven images and temples other than the temple in Jerusalem. He violates Mosaic Law on numerous points
and, because he is unrepentant and has led many to sin against God, he and his
line are doomed to be wiped out.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Responsorial Psalm: Psalm
106:6-7ab, 19-20, 21-22
R. (4a) Remember us, O Lord, as you favor your
people.
We have sinned, we and our
fathers;
we have committed crimes; we
have done wrong.
Our fathers in Egypt
considered not your wonders.
R. Remember us, O Lord, as you favor your people.
They made a calf in Horeb
and adored a molten image;
They exchanged their glory
for the image of a
grass-eating bullock.
R. Remember us, O Lord, as you favor your people.
They forgot the God who had
saved them,
who had done great deeds in Egypt
Wondrous deeds in the land of Ham
terrible things at the Red Sea .
R. Remember us, O Lord, as you favor your people.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary on Ps
106:6-7ab, 19-20, 21-22
Psalm 106 is a national lament. The
psalmist recalls the times the chosen people failed to follow the Law of Moses.
Instead they were seduced by foreign religions and barbaric practices. The
flight from Egypt is
remembered and how the people sinned – creating graven images even thought they
had been rescued by God’s mighty hand at the Red Sea .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gospel: Mark
8:1-10
In those days when there again
was a great crowd without anything to eat,
Jesus summoned the disciples
and said,
“My heart is moved with pity
for the crowd,
because they have been with
me now for three days
and have nothing to eat.
If I send them away hungry to
their homes,
they will collapse on the
way,
and some of them have come a
great distance.”
His disciples answered him,
“Where can anyone get enough bread
to satisfy them here in this
deserted place?”
Still he asked them, “How
many loaves do you have?”
They replied, “Seven.”
He ordered the crowd to sit
down on the ground.
Then, taking the seven loaves
he gave thanks, broke them,
and gave them to his
disciples to distribute,
and they distributed them to
the crowd.
They also had a few fish.
He said the blessing over
them
and ordered them distributed
also.
They ate and were satisfied.
They picked up the fragments
left over–seven baskets.
There were about four
thousand people.
He dismissed the crowd and
got into the boat with his disciples
and came to the region of
Dalmanutha.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary on Mk
8:1-10
In this selection
describes one of the major miracles, the multiplication of loaves and fishes.
There are actually two accounts; (Mark 8:1-10; above and Mark 6:31-44). It is proposed by some scholars that this is
actually the same event told from two different
traditions, but regardless, the implication is Eucharistic.
Much can be speculated about this
event. The number of the loaves being 7 would seem to indicate, through Hebrew
numerology, the fullness of loaves was present. The fact that they all ate
until they were satisfied (spiritually?) would indicate that the meal was
complete. The fragments left over filled 7 baskets; again that perfect number
is used.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reflection
It is said that those who
ignore the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them. This is a wise saying and one we take to
heart as we examine the fall of Solomon and the subsequent machinations of
Jeroboam. We step back today because we
have been watching this saga unfold for the past weeks. We saw the rise of King David and how God
anointed him. With the exception of the
one big mistake with Bathsheba, he was faithful to what God asked of him and
even in sin he was repentant. The people
saw this and followed him.
Next came his son Solomon, a
good and wise young man, filled with dedication to the people. His prayer brought him wisdom and wealth,
power over the whole domain and even as the power of leadership came to him, like
his father he abused it. In Solomon’s case, he married foreign women and
adopted pagan religious practices and fell.
He fell not just because of his excesses but because he failed to
provide an example of faith to those who looked to him.
Jeroboam seized upon this
weakness and, because there was no credible central leader (Solomon having
betrayed the Law of Moses) he was able to widen the gulf between the people and
God’s Law. He committed the sin of Aaron
(Exodus 32:1-6), building
not one but two golden calves. He told the
people they did not have to go to the Temple in Jerusalem as the Law required
(see Exodus 23:14ff)
(that was a difficult journey and he offered an easier alternative). Because it was easier and because it was more
in line with their baser instincts the people followed Jeroboam into sin.
Does this sound familiar? Do the elements ring of more recent
failures? When civic leaders offer more
comfortable alternatives, when they tell us our God is not a Just God, but his
rules are too harsh and they offer us more pleasant alternatives, are we not on
the same path? When our leaders tell us
that God would not want us to have children we did not plan for; or when they
tell us the potential for human life should be sacrificed in the name of
science so others might live more pleasant lives, are we not walking the same
path as those who followed Jeroboam so eagerly?
Moral leadership is something
we need at all levels, not just in the federal government. We need it locally and we need it in our
schools, our workplaces, and in our homes – the Domestic Church. Ultimately it is our responsibility to lead
based upon Christ’s law of love. It is
our responsibility to challenge those who offer an easier way that leads to
death. The life of the Christian may
never be an easy one, but if we are faithful, it will last an eternity.
Pax
[2]
ALTRE
[3]
The picture is “Jeroboam Offering Sacrifice for the Idol” by Jean-Honoré Fragonard,
1752
[4]
The readings are taken from the New
American Bible with the exception of the Psalm and its response which were
developed by the International Committee for English in Liturgy (ICEL). This
re-publication is not authorized by USCCB and is for private use only.
No comments:
Post a Comment